Teen court as
The teen accepts responsibility for their offense, appears before a judge and their peers, and is sentenced.
Limitations While this systematic review is one Teen court as the first to identify and synthesize data on the impact of Teen Court programs on juvenile offender outcomes, it has limitations.
Many teen courts operate much like a traditional courtholding hearings before a judge and jury with the jury deliberating to determine an appropriate disposition.
Four studies used multivariable linear or logistic regression models and 3 used survival analysis methods.
Current studies of Teen Courts, which vary widely in their program design and methodological quality, provide conflicting evidence of the impact of such programs on participating youth Butts et al, Teen court as.
The sanctions are determined by the Teen Court jury, and typically include community service, jury duty, and letters of apology.
Comparison data was drawn from offenders in a neighboring county who met age and offense severity criteria.
Selecting a comparison group of youth who refused to participate, did not complete the program, or were not involved in the juvenile justice system presents serious threats to internal validity.
In the Butts et al.
Most studies did not provide details about the types of interventions received in these alternative conditions.
The court, described as an adult judge model, was one of the only studies in which the majority of referred offenses were noted as vehicle-related.
Furthermore, most studies lacked detailed descriptions of core intervention components, comparison conditions, and outcome measures.